Manual vs. Automation Testing: The Ultimate Guide

by | 18-05-2023

The IT industry has evolved rapidly in the past few years, with new inventions and innovations grabbing the headlines. One thing that hasn’t changed, however, is the chronology of the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). From requirement gathering to deployment, every step should be given equal importance. Meanwhile, one cannot ignore the significance of the testing phase, as it ensures that the product delivered to the client is without any errors or bugs. The software quality assurance team is hired by each software company to find any faults in the product and ensure smooth delivery to the client.

Software Testing can be divided into two major categories: Manual and Automation testing. Both techniques can help testers achieve their goals and are leveraged by the quality assurers in the production environment. This blog will differentiate both types of testing and explain the scenarios in which manual or automation testing should be given preference.

What Is Manual Testing?

It is the software testing process in which softwares are tested manually without any intervention from the automated tools. Here, test cases are created by humans and are executed as per the client’s perspective to ensure that the software is performing according to the requirements. The manual testing phase primarily depends on the tester’s skills and ability to create relevant test cases and find any defects in the product.

Types Of Manual Testing

Following are some of the techniques opted for by manual testers:

1) Black Box Testing

In this method, the software quality assurer only tests the external functionalities of the system without access to the source code.

2) White Box Testing

Also known as structural testing, White Box Testing involves rigorous testing of the source code and internal structure of the product.

3) Grey Box Testing

Here, a combination of black-and-white box testing approaches is applied to test the system.

4) Integration Testing

This technique is implemented to test the system after different application modules are integrated.

Pros Of Manual Testing

  • Lower initial investment cost
  • Preferred for applications with constantly changing UI
  • No coding skills required
  • The human cognitive ability to determine defects becomes prevalent
  • Rapid feedback

Cons Of Manual Testing

  • Prone to human errors
  • A large number of workforce required
  • A time-consuming process
  • Fails to cover all testing methodologies

What Is Automation Testing?

In this testing technique, automated tools are used to create and execute test cases as compared to manually testing each module. Automation Testing enhances speed and efficiency in rigorously testing the system, ensuring that the product delivered to the client is error-free. Some of the most common tools leveraged for automation testing are Selenium, Appium, Testsigma, Robotium, etc.

Types Of Automation Testing

1) Functional Testing

This approach involves testing the system’s overall functionality with minimal or no awareness of the underlying structure.

2) Non-Functional Testing

Here, various metrics, like reliability, speed, efficiency, security, etc., are thoroughly evaluated to test the system after the functional testing has been performed in the initial stage.

3) Regression Testing

To ensure that the product works normally according to the client’s requirements after some changes have been made, Regression Testing involves executing functional and non-functional testing in several iterations.

Pros Of Automation Testing

  • Yields result quickly and efficiently
  • Cost-effective
  • Can detect errors that a human is unable to trace
  • Greater transparency

Cons Of Automation Testing

  • Automated tools are expensive
  • Time-intensive technique
  • Unable to test specific visual aspects like font size, color composure, etc.


The testing phase is one of the crucial parts of the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). Each software company requires a dedicated software quality assurance team to ensure that the product delivered to the client is error-free and performs according to the requirements. This blog shed light on two common testing methodologies, named Manual and Automation Testing, providing a comprehensive comparison of both techniques. The pros and cons of both methods were discussed in detail to facilitate the readers.

Recent Posts

Bun 1.0 released
Bun 1.0 Released as Fast Alternative to Node.js

The JavaScript toolkit Bun has recently announced its 1.0 release. Bun aims to provide a faster alternative to Node.js for running, building, testing, and debugging JavaScript and TypeScript.Created by Jarred Sumner, CEO of Oven, Bun is written in Zig and designed to eliminate the slowness and complexity that has accumulated in JavaScript tooling over time. […]

Adobe Announces the Launch of New AI Features
Adobe Announces the Launch of New AI Features

Embracing AI technology, Adobe has unveiled a host of revolutionary features. After months of rigorous testing and evaluating feedback, these AI generative features have been integrated into Adobe’s editing tools, including Photoshop. It is pertinent to mention that Adobe was testing features such as the ability to generate images from text for the previous six […]

Google Launches Generative AI in India and Japan
Google Launches Generative AI in India and Japan

In a cutting-edge development, Google has introduced the integration of generative AI to enhance the search experience for internet users. This announcement is in line with Google’s commitment to transform the way people search for information, displaying the most relevant and personalized information to the users. It’s pertinent to mention, however, that the search engine […]

Introduction to Code Llama
Meta Introduces Code Llama – A Powerful Large Language Model for Developers

Meta has recently unveiled an AI-powered tool specific for coding purposes. Code Llama, which is available to the general public in several versions, is a machine-learning system that has the ability to generate and explain code in natural language – particularly English. Code Llama, a large language model (LLM), uses text input to generate code. […]

Profile Picture

Muhammad Mustafa is an experienced content writer with expertise in SEO. With a background in Software Engineering, Mustafa combines his knowledge of various technology stacks with a passion for writing. Besides writing, he loves cricket and traveling.

Muhammad Mustafa

Related Posts

Tips for Startups to Reduce Their Software Product Development Costs

The biggest challenge facing the most ambitious startups today is developing software that operates on a tight budget. However, starting your own business is fun, but sometimes you have to risk...

Benefits Of Hiring A Web Development Company

Building a website sounds like an easy task, but no matter how many times you think you can create a website, The team of professional web developers will provide you with the best website...

7 Steps to Increase your Website Security

Websites are the tools to help you in promoting your businesses. You can promote your business through a website, earn revenue, attract new customers, and store confidential information. These...

Factors That Will Make Your Website More Credible

The majority of us know that one element that needs to convert more website visitors into paying customers is credibility. However, customers that do not have trust in you will not buy from you. ...

Why our clients
love us?

Our clients love us because we prioritize effective communication and are committed to delivering high-quality software solutions that meet the highest standards of excellence.

anton testimonial for ropstam solutions

“They met expectations with every aspect of design and development of the product, and we’ve seen an increase in downloads and monthly users.”

Anton Neugebauer, CEO, RealAdvice Agency
tariehk testimonial for ropstam solutions

“Willing to accommodate nonprofit budgets, Ropstam brought their robust experience to the project. They checked in consistently, and were communicative, easy to reach, and responsive.”

Tariehk, VP of Marketing.
mike stanzyk testimonial for ropstam solutions

“Their dedication to their clients is really impressive.  Ropstam Solutions Inc. communicates effectively with the client to ensure customer satisfaction.”

Mike Stanzyk, CEO, Stanzyk LLC

“Ropstam was an excellent partner in bringing our vision to life! They managed to strike the right balance between aesthetics and functionality, ensuring that the end product was not only visually appealing but also practical and usable.”

Jackie Philbin, Director - Nutrition for Longevity

Supercharge your software development with our expert team – get in touch today!

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.